The Shannon diversity index (H) is one of the most widely used ways to summarize biodiversity from a species count into a single comparable number. It's used across ecology, conservation biology, and environmental monitoring to track how diverse a community is and whether that diversity is changing over time.
How the Shannon index works
The Shannon index combines two things that a simple species count misses: how many species are present (richness) and how evenly individuals are spread across them (evenness). The formula H = -sum(p_i · ln(p_i)) computes each species' proportion of the total sample, weights it by its own natural log, and sums the results. Because rare species contribute a large negative log term multiplied by a small proportion, and common species contribute a small negative log term multiplied by a large proportion, the formula balances contributions from both rare and abundant species — unlike richness alone, which treats every species equally regardless of abundance.
Inputs and what they mean
The calculator only needs a name and a count for each species you observed — the count can be individuals, colonies, or any consistent unit of abundance. Species richness (S) and total sample size (N) are derived automatically from your rows. The result is dimensionless: it depends only on the relative proportions between species, not on the units you used to count them, so H = 1.4 means the same thing whether your counts are in individuals, biomass, or percent cover, as long as you're consistent within one sample.
Limits and edge cases
The Shannon index assumes your sample is representative of the community you're studying — a small or biased survey can under- or over-estimate true diversity, especially for rare species that are easy to miss. The index also doesn't tell you which species are present, only how the abundance is distributed, so two very different communities can have the same H by coincidence. When comparing sites or time periods, keep sampling method and effort consistent, since a bigger sample generally detects more rare species and can inflate richness independent of any real ecological change. For communities with very skewed abundance, consider comparing H alongside Simpson's index, which weights dominant species more heavily and can tell a different story about which community is 'more diverse.'